The Office in the Studio · The Administration of ModernismSprache deutsch

Mari Dumett

Mari Dumett is an art historian and curator. Her primary area of research is post-World War II American and European art and critical theory, with an emphasis on performance art and object sculpture. She completed all of the requirements for her doctorate at Boston University in September 2008, with the degree to be conferred in January 2009. Her current book project is an analytic history of the international art collective Fluxus, 1962-1978, entitled Corporate Imaginations: the Fluxus Collective in the Age of Multinational Capitalism. In 2007, she co-curated The Avant-Garde: From Futurism to Fluxus. This was the inaugural exhibition at the Jonas Mekas Visual Arts Center in Vilnius, Lithuania, for which a full-page, color catalogue was produced, including Mari’s essay “George Maciunas and Fluxus’s Rear-Guard.” Also in 2007, she was invited to give talks on Fluxus at the Staatliche Akademie der Bildenden Künste, Karlsruhe, Germany, and at the University of York, York, UK for the international conference Real Things: Matter, Materiality and Representation, 1880 to the Present. Her essay “The Great Executive Dream: George Maciunas, Adriano Olivetti, and Fluxus Incorporated” will appear in the next issue of the journal Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics published by Harvard University Press. Mari also lectures at the Rhode Island School of Design in Providence, RI.

Fluxus and the Postwar Subject of Organization


Dutch artist Willem de Ridder once stated: “I loved the idea that George was setting up a business….It created a fantastic confusion and nobody dared to take the risk not to take you seriously….” Ridder was speaking of the Lithuanian-born artist George Maciunas and his founding of the art group Fluxus (1962 to 1978). My paper will take off from this point of Fluxus’s “fantastic confusion,” arguing that for all its criticality, Fluxus also ambivalently shared aspects of the rising corporate culture of the post-World War II period. What was the historical significance of this apparent contradiction at the heart of Fluxus that a diverse array of international artists known for their anarchical cultural acts, such as demolishing a classical piano, should willingly be “incorporated” into a business enterprise for the selling of “Fluxus Products”? Through close readings of the way Maciunas structured and directed Fluxus, as well as of specific performances (including comparison to other Fluxus artists), I will argue that Maciunas developed an alternative model of critical art that prioritized the (white-collar) labor of organization as the new artistic labor within the postwar system of multinational capitalism. Furthermore, I will suggest that the art works represented strategies by which the artists (and their viewers) could become conscious critical subjects of organization in relation to a broader discourse on the fate of the individual within an increasingly organized, mechanized, routinized, and systematized society.


Homepage

Contact: maridumett@gmail.com