The Office in the Studio · The Administration of ModernismSprache deutsch

Caroline A. Jones

Caroline Jones teaches contemporary art and theory in the History, Theory, and Criticism Section of the Department of Architecture at MIT. She received an A.B. in Fine Arts from Harvard-Radcliffe in 1977, and worked in the museum field for many years, serving as an administrator at The Museum of Modern Art in New York, and Assistant Director for Curatorial Affairs at the Harvard University Art Museums. After completing masters degree work at New York University’s Institute of Fine Arts, she received an MA from Stanford University, where she also completed her PhD degree in 1992 . Producer/director of two documentary films and curator of many exhibitions, her books include major museum publications, such as Modern Art at Harvard (Abbeville, 1985) and Bay Area Figurative Art, 1950-1965 (University of California Press, 1990), the award-winning Machine in the Studio: Constructing the Postwar American Artist (University of Chicago Press, 1996/98), and the co-edited volume Picturing Science, Producing Art (Routledge, 1999). Her most recent book, Eyesight Alone: Clement Greenberg’s Modernism and the Bureaucratization of the Senses, was recently published by the University of Chicago Press; for the MIT List Visual Art Center she edited the forthcoming Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art. During the 2005-06 academic year she was Professeur invité at the Institute national d’histoire de l’art in Paris, where she was conducting research on global exhibitions for her next project, titled Desires for the World Picture.

“Artist / Office / System / Server”

The widespread influence of systems theory may have peaked in an obvious way in the 1970s with the "Live System" work of Hans Haacke and others, but its origins and impact extend further in both directions. This paper will begin from studies of bureaucratized sensory regimes in mid-century modernism, and will examine some manifestations of systems-thinking (as in, for example, Buckminster Fuller) to question how these models are currently active today in "relational" practices (Tiravanija, Eliasson, et al.). Bureaucracy was the first critique of monarchic centralized power; how have its ethics and procedures continued to inspire the server/user mode of contemporary art?

Homepage