Methods

The transitions in Israel and Germany

In the two countries, we focus on the following three educational passages:

transition grade Israel Germany
1st 4 there is no transition from grade 4 to 5 from elementary school to secondary education (Hauptschule [low], Realschule [medium], Gymnasium [high])
2nd 9 from comprehensive school into the academic or professional path from Hauptschule to vocational training or further schooling
3rd 10 (D)
11 (IL)

decision about the type of Bagrut pursued
from Realschule to vocational training or further schooling

Israel has a comprehensive school system without external differentiation until grade nine, including one year of compulsory kindergarten followed by six years of primary school and three years of lower secondary school afterwards. The first transition takes place in grade nine. At this point students can choose between general (academic) and professional educational streams attended for three years (upper secondary school). The general (academic) path prepares for tertiary education and ends with an exam that qualifies for university entrance. The technical stream consisting of preparatory professional training usually results in the acquisition of a technical diploma. This diploma does not qualify students for university entrance, thus being less valued in comparison to the academic alternative. Both qualifications bear the title of ‘matriculation exam’ (Bagrut).

The general school system in Germany traditionally has three tracks. After four years of primary education students go on either to the Hauptschule, the Realschule or the Gymnasium and in some federal states also to the comprehensive school. The Hauptschule leads to a minimum qualification, while the Realschule results in a medium-range qualification. Both degrees prepare for an apprenticeship in the German dual system of vocational training, albeit each with traditionally different occupational fields. The Gymnasium leads to the Abitur, the general qualification for university entrance, traditionally followed by university studies. The professional training system is dominated by vocational training in the ‘dual system’, that is a combination of general education in vocational schools and vocational training in companies. Training within the dual system lasts between two and three years depending on the educational level accomplished so far and on the type of apprenticeship chosen.

Two-wave-panel: Before and after the transition

The empirical study consists of a two-wave panel. In the first wave we collect information on central conditions relevant to the educational decisions of students and their parents. In additional achievement tests we assess students’ performance in different competence realms such as the host-country language and cognitive skills. For this purpose, we conduct face-to-face interviews with children and their mothers in grade 4 as well as with adolescents and their mothers in grade 9 and 11 in Israel and in grade 9 and 10 in Germany. One year later, after the educational decisions are made, we again capture the various relevant conditions and the eventual transition outcomes and consequences via a telephone survey (CATI).

transition grade first wave: face-to-face interviews second wave: CATI
1st 4 with children and their mothers
(questionnaires, achievement tests)
with mothers (D)
2nd 9 with adolescents and their mothers
(questionnaires, achievement tests)
with adolescents
3rd 10 (D)
11 (IL)
with adolescents and their mothers
(questionnaires, achievement tests)
with adolescents

Migrant groups

The target groups in Israel and Germany are:

Israel Germany
reference group Ashkenazi Israelis Germans (without migration background)
immigrants from the FSU Aussiedler
FSU Jews FSU Jews
poor performing groups Mizrahi Israelis Turks

Sample

For Israel, we apply a multi-stage sampling procedure which includes the following steps:

  1. random selection of districts (stratified by region and socioeconomic characteristics)
  2. random sample of individuals (in the relevant age groups)
  3. matching of addresses with telephone numbers using the national telephone register
  4. telephone screening to identify FSU Jews and the group of Ashkenazi and Mizrahi (Ashkenazi and Mizrahi are not sampled separately because of their proportion in the population, i.e., about 50% each) and to ensure that the student attends grade 4, 9 or 11

For Germany, the sampling proceedings also involve several steps:

  1. selection of 14 cities in three federal states: Hamburg, Frankfurt (Hessen), and 12 cities in Northrhine-Westphalia (Bielefeld, Bonn, Detmold, Dortmund, Duisburg, Düsseldorf, Essen, Gütersloh, Hamm, Köln, Münster, Paderborn)
  2. resident identification lists for the selected age cohorts
  3. identification of target group members based on a combination of information on students’ and parents’ country of birth and students’ nationality (in three cities only names were available; here we applied onomastics to identify groups via names)
  4. random sample of target group members
  5. telephone screening to ensure group membership and that the student attends grade 4, 9 or 10

Survey design

Israel Germany
FSU Jews Mizrahim +
Ashkenazim
Aussiedler FSU Jews Turks Germans
1st I
II
300
no transition
300
no transition
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
2nd I
II
300
300
300
300
200
200
-
-
200
200
200
200
3rd I
II
300
300
300
300
200
200
-
-
200
200
200
200

N Israel: 3000; N Germany: 4000

University of Jena
Department of Developmental Psychology
Am Steiger 3, Haus 1
07743 Jena, Germany

Phone: + 49 (0) 3641 – 945200
Fax: + 49 (0) 3641 – 945202
Email: elke.schroeder@uni-jena.de